Skip to content

Conversation

@terraform-ibm-modules-ops
Copy link
Contributor

@terraform-ibm-modules-ops terraform-ibm-modules-ops commented Sep 18, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
sysdig-deploy (source) patch 1.93.4 -> 1.93.6
terraform-ibm-modules/base-ocp-vpc/ibm (source) module minor 3.59.0 -> 3.60.0
terraform-ibm-modules/scc-workload-protection/ibm (source) module minor 1.11.6 -> 1.12.0

Release Notes

sysdiglabs/charts (sysdig-deploy)

v1.93.6

Compare Source

What's Changed
Chores
  • sysdig-deploy e44e190a: Automatic version bump due to updated dependencies (#​2387)
Full diff: sysdiglabs/charts@sysdig-deploy-1.93.5...sysdig-deploy-1.93.6

v1.93.5

Compare Source

What's Changed
Chores
  • sysdig-deploy bb6a61fa: Automatic version bump due to updated dependencies (#​2380)
Full diff: sysdiglabs/charts@sysdig-deploy-1.93.4...sysdig-deploy-1.93.5
terraform-ibm-modules/terraform-ibm-base-ocp-vpc (terraform-ibm-modules/base-ocp-vpc/ibm)

v3.60.0

Compare Source

Features
  • add support for api-key reset resource block.

IMPORTANT:

  • During updates, you may observe the destruction of a null_resource. This is expected and has no impact on existing resources.
  • Moving forward, there is no capability to check for the existence of the containers-kubernetes-key ahead of cluster creation. As a result, the key will always be created, even if it already exists. (#​795) (381aaea)

v3.59.2

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v3.59.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
terraform-ibm-modules/terraform-ibm-scc-workload-protection (terraform-ibm-modules/scc-workload-protection/ibm)

v1.12.0

Compare Source

Features

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@terraform-ibm-modules-dev

/run pipeline

1 similar comment
@Aashiq-J
Copy link
Member

/run pipeline

@terraform-ibm-modules-ops terraform-ibm-modules-ops changed the title chore(deps): update terraform terraform-ibm-modules/base-ocp-vpc/ibm to v3.59.1 fix(deps): update dependencies Sep 19, 2025
@terraform-ibm-modules-dev

/run pipeline

@terraform-ibm-modules-dev

/run pipeline

@terraform-ibm-modules-dev

/run pipeline

@terraform-ibm-modules-dev

/run pipeline

2 similar comments
@Aashiq-J
Copy link
Member

/run pipeline

@Aashiq-J
Copy link
Member

/run pipeline

@Aashiq-J
Copy link
Member

        	            	│       "Result": {
        	            	│           "details": "{\"description\":\"Sysdig instance update request return code: 400 message: 400 BAD_REQUEST\",\"enabled\":false,\"active\":false,\"last_active\":0}",
        	            	│           "error_code": "RC-ServiceBrokerErrorResponse",
        	            	│           "message": "The broker for 'Cloud Monitoring' service returned error, [400, Bad Request] Sysdig instance update request return code: 400 message: 400 BAD_REQUEST. If this is unexpected, open a support ticket with the service to help troubleshoot the issue.",
        	            	│           "status_code": 422,
        	            	│           "transaction_id": "626c-0ae9af0d7e23982a"
        	            	│       },
        	            	│       "RawResult": null
        	            	│   }

seems to be a backend error.

@Aashiq-J
Copy link
Member

/run pipeline

@terraform-ibm-modules-dev

/run pipeline

@Aashiq-J Aashiq-J merged commit bedc012 into main Sep 22, 2025
2 checks passed
@Aashiq-J Aashiq-J deleted the renovate/dependencies branch September 22, 2025 13:24
@terraform-ibm-modules-ops
Copy link
Contributor Author

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.8.5 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants